NCGA providing farmer perspective for biotech regulations

first_imgShare Facebook Twitter Google + LinkedIn Pinterest The National Corn Growers Association brought the voice of farmers into important conversations on U.S. biotechnology regulations during the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service public comment meeting held at the University of California, Davis last week. This session, which was the second of three, offered the opportunity to personally provide input on the part 340 proposed rule that would modify the science-based federal regulatory framework that regulates genetically engineered organisms use in agriculture.NCGA Past president Leon Corzine and Freedom to Operate Action Team Vice Chair Brandon Hunnicutt both spoke during the meeting, providing insight into the impact such regulations have upon farmers. Drawing upon firsthand experience with the importance of biotech tools, they stressed the value farmers place on regulatory efficiency and transparency in a system based solidly in science. The farmer leaders then urged officials present to refine the proposal so that USDA can chart a path forward for agricultural biotechnology and products derived from other precision breeding tools that offers regulatory relief and consistency.Comments noted that farmers have a strong interest in reducing the regulatory burden that stifles innovation and suppresses competition. Due to the ever-increasing challenges, from pests to environmental stressors, they expressed the necessity of maintaining access to tools which allow farmers to react quickly and nimbly to the situations seen in their fields.Testimony also expressed appreciation for the rational approach taken in the draft document to determining regulated products, noting that the product-based approach, instead of a processed-based approach, makes scientific sense. Additionally, testimony expressed support for the idea of looking at new, innovative technologies, like gene editing, through an accurate scientific lens versus regulating them in the same manner as transgenics simply because of legacy policies.This hearing and the testimony provided built upon the work undertaken by the Kansas Corn Growers Association, who represented corn farmers with testimony given by KCGA Director of Research and Stewardship Dale Fjell during the first session in Kansas City on June 6.last_img

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *